In addition to the various genuine
demands raised by the various Central Government Employees
Federations/Associations with the Empowered Committee of Secretaries, I would
like them to bring these 2 important crucial issues before the Empowered
Committee of Secretaries for implementation:
1. RETENTION OF 3% INCREMENT
IN VII CPC RECOMMENDATIONS IN CASE OF PROMOTION LEADS TO LOWER FINANCIAL
BENEFITS BY FEW THOUSANDS THAN THE EXISTING BENEFITS UNDER 6TH CPC
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The financial benefit would be much
lower than what a government servant would be getting under VI CPC
recommendation on promotion, because the existing benefit on promotion carry
change in grade pay apart from 3% increase in Pay+Grade Pay. The following
illustration shall show the huge difference:
Suppose an employee whose Pay is
Rs.10400/- and the Grade pay is Rs. 2800/- totalling to Rs.13200/- (in the Pay
band of 5200-20200), gets his next promotion to the Grade Pay of Rs.4200/- he
will be entitled to the following hike in total remuneration under the existing
VI CPC recommendation as a result of promotion::
Rs.13200/- x 3% increment
=Rs.400Difference in Grade Pay from Rs.2800/- to Rs.4200/-= Rs.1400/-
Total increase of increment in basic
pay and Grade Pay= Rs.1800/-
D.A. at 125% as on 1/1/2016 on Rs.1800/-
= Rs.2250/-
HRA at 30%(assuming X city) on
Rs.1800/- =Rs.540/-
Total monetary benefit = Rs.4590/-
Whereas the net monetary benefit
under VII CPC recommendation, as a result of promotion in the above case will
be much lower than the above illustration as shown under:
Equivalent Basic Pay for Rs.13200/-
come to Rs.33900/- as per pay matrix
Rs.33900 x 3% increment = Rs.1017/- (placed
at Rs.35,400 as per pay matrix in the next level)
Total difference Rs.35400/- (–)
Rs33900/- = 1500/-
D.A. at 0% as on 1/1/2016 on Rs.1500/-=
0
HRA at 24% (assuming X city) on
Rs.1500/- =Rs.360/-
Total monetary benefit =
Rs.1860/-only as against the existing Rs.4590/- leading to shortage of Rs.
2730/-
·
This
is a big blunder committed by the VII Pay commission.
·
Therefore
the increment on promotion should be at-least 5 to 6% to bring the benefit of
increment on promotion to the existing level.
·
Whether
increase of percentage for annual increment is considered or not, but increment
of percentage for promotions definitely need to be implemented to bring the
level of monetary benefit to the existing level.
2. NON RECOMMENDATION OF VII
CPC REGARDING MERGER OF 50% OF D.A. WITH BASIC PAY WHEN D.A. CROSSES 50% IS A
GREAT DISAPPOINTMENT:
The long standing demand of the
central government employees for merger of 50% D.A with basic was not
implemented by the government on the excuse that the VI CPC had not made such a
proposal. Even the VII CPC is totally silent about this aspect. It appears no
one has demanded the same before the VII CPC for consideration.
It is quite surprising that such a
vital issue of non-recommendation of merger of D.A with basic pay when D.A
crosses 50% is not being opposed by any central government associations or pointed
out by the media. Had it been recommended by the VII CPC, the government shall
definitely implement the same and the benefit of hike in salary as a result of
merger of D.A with basic when it cross 50%, would be so vast that no government
servant would crave for timely setting up of next VIII Central Pay commission.
M. DORAI
R/sir
ReplyDeleteyour post is very good but the actual position is as under
in sixth cpc if any official get promotion upto 31-12-2015 he get increase of pay of Rs-1800 then when his pay is fixed in 7th pc then he got benifit of 2.57 multiple on 1800 also and the basic pay got increased i.e 1800x2.57= 4626 and he got all benefit of allowances i.e DA, HRA ect on 4626 and the official who promoted after 31-12-2015 he got the difference of only rs 1600/- and the official get all the benefit on 1600 only
Mr.dorai sir contention is not correct. as per VII CPC report, page no.85, illustration 5.1.52, the official's basic pay after multiplying with fitment factor 2.57, he will be placed at next above the level in pay matrix after adding notional increment.
ReplyDelete