No.
CHQ/AIAIASP/2018-2020/13. 18.06.2018.
To,
The Director
General(Posts)
Department of
Posts
Dak Bhawan,
Sansad Marg
New
Delhi-110001.
Subject
: Regarding withdrawal of guidelines for allotment/re allotment of Postal Service
Group “B” officers from one Circle/Unit to other Circle/Unit and restoration of old transfer policy.
Respected
Madam,
With due respect the association likes
to draw your kind attention on the “Revised guidelines to be followed on
allotment/re-allotment of Postal Service Group ‘B’ officers from one
Circle/Unit to other Circle/Unit issued
vide Dte circular No-9-23/2014-SPG dated 18-05-2018.The following points are placed
below for sympathetic consideration and
necessary action:-
1-That a
policy on allotment of PS Group ‘B’ officers was in vogue since 23-03-2017
which has been amended on 18-05-2018 without operating the earlier guidelines. This
guideline was in operation since 15-09-2014 and was amended after three years
after taking into the considerations of welfare of the employees. It is
surprisingly to mention that the policy issued on 23-03-2017 has been changed suddenly
without inviting suggestions, views, and comments from stake holders, Head of
circles and from the Association. It was in vogue to invite suggestions, views
comments from the representatives to invoke such policies for the sake of
employees and employers. The earlier policy issued on 23-03-2017 was welcomed
by the association and its members as it was issued to accommodate the PS Group
‘B officers to their home Circle upto the extent possible and if not possible
with respect to available vacancy in the particular Circle the officer will be
allotted to nearby Circle. This policy has a positive aspect for the
members/officers and it was felt that department is thinking for the welfare of
their employees and setting up a rotation to create a good environment of
working.
2. It is mention that the promotion
of the PS Group ‘B’ cadre comes from the feeder cadre of IP/ASP who after
serving more than 20-25 years and after reaching more than 40-45 years of age
get this opportunity. We know that the age above 45 is vulnerable in every
aspect where there is huge liability coming from all corners in terms of
education of growing children, mental and physical support of old aged parents
and health issues of spouse and self. The officer posted near the home town
Division/Region able to manage all these affairs in emergent situations, but in
the present policy guideline it would not be possible at all to address the
situations as per need effectively. It
is also worth to mention that an employee cannot said to have been a sound
state a mind to deliver excellence devoted towards goal and objective of the
department where there is un-stability, unsound condition of his family
emerging from distant transfer liability. The family comprising of sons,
daughters and old age ailing parents are often need a support of bread earner
and spearhead of family.
3. The other point of this policy is
to spare away the officer for three odd years from their root on the ground to
meet the need for striking balance between requirement of the organizations and
the personal aspiration of the officers. It is worth to mention that the basic
idea has not substantially addressed on various aspect. So far as the
aspirations of the officers are concerned it cannot overlap over the basic need
of family maintenance within a good and dignified manner. So far as the
requirement of the organization is concerned every officer /employee is devoted
to the development of the department and dislocation at such point to such
officers will not serve any purpose but to hamper the requirement of the
organization. He will not be fully prepared to deliver cent percent in the
dislocated area. We know that every dislocation has cascading effect cast a
hardship to everyone and invite unforeseen problems.
4.
The present policy state to focus
on feeder cadre for promotion to JTS of IPOs Group ‘A’ and here are expected to
get exposure by working in different Circle/Unit but it does not appears
realistic because it equate with the
avenues ,potentials enthusiasm of nascent entrant of Direct recruited officer
in IPOs cadre. There is basic difference between officer of Direct recruit and promotes,
as former has to develop and grow as an officer in the department with least
count of liabilities blessed with new age, innovative ideas, new avenues and
rising future but the latter with huge quantum of liabilities followed by the
fast ageing, health issues, family affairs and least count of feather to fly nearly at the stage to set down in the horizon
of avenues. It is worth to mention that so far as exposure in other Circle are
concerned every Circle is full of exposure have potential to lead. If we throw
light on the geographical situations of the some large Circles like U.P, M.P.
Maharastra, Bihar, W.B., Rajsthan A.P. Tamilnadu, etc. forms a Circle within a Circle in terms of language ,accessibility of postal
network a vast postal network inviting challenges
before department to implement its policies. There is always a challenge,
exposure to work in such a Circle in different capacities. If one can be
allotted to U.P. Circle where there is seven regions and normal policy
guideline of tenure transfer applies for 2 to 3 years one person with left out
service of 15 to 20 years cannot be able to get opportunity to serve in the
same region.
5. As the new policy has been issued
in the month of May 2018 and if it is implemented for his academic session it
would be against the model transfer guidelines. As per existing practice it was
in vogue to invite request for choice station for posting and this process
should be initiated well in advance so that it may be processed in the month of
March to April and transferee would able to settle his family and get admission
to their ward for the current session but as per scenario it would not be
possible to implement it. If the department will implement the new policy of
transfer to another Circle in the mid- session it would be detrimental to the
interest of the officer and thereby they will suffer a lot.
6. It is mention that the supplementary
result of LDCE of PS group ‘B’ for the
year 2012 was declared on 26.02.2018 and result of examination held on
18.12.2016 was declared on 10-04-2018
after a long hurdles and at the time of its declaration the transfer and
promotion policy was in existence which was issued in the year 2017.As such the
allotment and promotion of newly passed officers may be operated as per
existing policy of 2017.There is no viable justification to amend this policy in a haste to dislocate
a lot number of officer in this year and in the coming years.
It is therefore requested kindly to review the complications described
in the foregoing paras and consider sympathetically the pitiable condition of
the officer and withdraw the new policy guideline issued on 18-05-2018 and issue
allotment of newly promoted PS Group ‘B’ officers as per guidelines issued on 23.03.2017.
Your Sincerely
(Rajiv
Kumar)
General
Secretary.
